OPINION: Abbatiello says voting records tell tale
 |  July 15, 2008  |   13 Comments
 

By Al Abbatiello

The voting record of a politician is a factual history of their actions and decisions.

This history cannot be denied or excused. Voting records are testimony to the allegiances of politicians and Stevenson’s record tells a tale of special interest influence.

Our county has not been well served by District 1 Commissioner Cyndi Stevenson. In 2004, she was heavily financed (nearly $110,000) by developers and, in an open primary where all parties could vote, she was elected with only 35.9 percent of the votes cast (less than 11 percent of registered voters).

After election, she voted for 44 of 47 new developments (more than 22,000 new homes) and other ill-advised votes, including the approval of a water bottling plant incentive plan, a future land use map amendment supporting leap-frog/urban sprawl development on Trout Creek that included building heights up to 52 feet, and a seldom used, million dollar equestrian center in Hastings. Couple this with approving more than 400 land use changes and you might decide money really does talk.

The commissioner denies anything influenced her decisions. But she can’t deny her voting record and the benefit to special interests. We are now dealing with the congestion and safety issues dealt to us by Stevenson and the other commissioners with whom she served at that time. From the time I moved here in 1998 county commissioners were virtual “rubber stamps” approving most of the development that came before them. Votes were usually 4-1 in favor.

From 1998 through 2006, 72,632 homes were approved—with no assurance that needed infrastructure would be in place. Approximately 62,000 homes remain to be built.

The announced temporary “fix” of the on/off ramps at Interstate 95 and County Road 210 is another example of ill-advised decision making. Twin Creeks, a DRI approved by Stevenson, was to have made this road improvement as part of their development order.

Unfortunately, after a two-year delay, and with Twin Creeks being in financial crisis, the county and FDOT have each “anted up” $7 million in taxpayer money to move the project forward.

While Stevenson has supported development, road improvements are lagging behind. The northwest sector is inundated with traffic, with no planning to relieve congestion anytime soon. Some new roads have been built, but the daily congestion points remain. No new roads have been built for people to leave the county except for Bartram Parkway, which is highly congested during peak hour travel. The Bartram Park community has another 7,000 homes to be built, creating even more congestion.

Starting in 2007 Stevenson began expressing “surprise” at the “insane congestion” around the county, blaming other commissions, and claiming she tried to slow the growth. Her voting records show a different story.

With a pro-growth commission she usually voted with the majority and with a slow-growth commission she again votes with the majority. What do we think will happen if the majority changes once again? This county needs independent votes by its commissioners, not ones influenced by others.

Charter government is another issue of “waffling” by Stevenson. She was against charter before she was for it, as reflected in the records. She now supports charter but then, it is an election year.

We must manage residential growth, keep it slow, while improving our commercial business base to create jobs in St. Johns County.

We can’t continue reacting to development requests and the resulting road congestion, crowded chools, environmental impacts and other problems that come with new home development. We need planning to determine where we are and where we want to be. We need a strategic plan addressing our long erm needs and goals and a roadmap to achieve those county goals.

 The most important issue in the county is the lack of a long range strategic plan. To grow our economy, job and tax base, and continue or expand services, we must engage in a process for managing our county and its direction in terms of action plans, implementation strategies, performance measures and progress evaluations. We must know the what, where, when, how and why of our growth strategy as well as the benefits to the citizens of this county.

The difference between me and my opponent is that I bring a platform of

ideas, strategic thinking and action plans for the long range development of the county and for bringing our citizens into the planning process through district advisory committees for each district.

 I’m the only candidate with a plan of action (www.votealabbatiello.com).

Platitudes and empty words are no substitute for action by a county commissioner. My only special interest is the citizens of St. Johns County and their health, safety, and welfare.

Al Abbatiello is a Republican candidate for the St. Johns County Commission District 1 seat.

>>Win an Annual Membership to the Jacksonville Zoo & Gardens, click here!

 
 

Rate OPINION: Abbatiello says voting records tell tale

3.5 stars Ave. rating: 3.5 from 14 votes.
  
ADVERTISEMENT

Visitor Comments »

marci skinner
July 10th 2008 - 10:59PM
I am tired of political campaigns where all we hear are darts being thrown at oponents. All I have heard from Mr. Abbatiello is negative, negative negative stabbings thrown at Commishioner Stevenson. To me that is not the way to win a campaign. If that is all you have to go on then you do not deserve to be our county commishioner. I have not seen one negative remark about Mr. Abbatiello coming from Commishioner Stevenson. To me that shows real cl. Mr. Abbatiello needs to stop running his campaign in the letter to the editor collum.
 
Clara Cowan
July 11th 2008 - 8:07AM
Oh Please! Facts are facts. Look at Commissioner Stevenson's voting record. Negative, I agree, her voting record is very negative toward our way of life and that is a fact. You can whine all you like but you can't change history (or traffic jams). If you look at the money that put her in office it is mostly from developers. Have you really watched her the past 4 years? Don't get angry with the messenger, do your home work and find out it isn't negative campaigning it is telling people exactly what has been going on.
 
Jules Edwards
July 11th 2008 - 10:53AM
I like Commissioner Stevenson, I think she is a great person. She isn't a good leader, and that's what we need for the county, a good leader; one that has their own opinion and doesn't follow the pack. Mr. Abbatiello is not being negative, he's being factual. Keep your emotions out of politics, and look at the facts -- the Commissioners voting record is public and very slanted toward over development - why is that? Why in the last year has she all of a sudden flip-flopped on her original voting record? Why did she say she has be working on the funding for 210 Interchange for three years, why didn't she and the other Commissioners do something before they put so many homes off 210 causing us such traffic madness. I say let her record speak for her, and if that be negative then negative it is!
 
Nicole Alvarez
July 11th 2008 - 11:10AM
Come on Ms. Skinner, don't you know that voting records are a huge reflection if not the main proof of what a politician has done for its consuents during their political "reign". Unfortunately Commissioner Stevensons' 4 year reign carries this load. If she was so proud of her voting record than I would like to know why she isn't pointing it out on her current campaign? I do not want to be represented by someone who is looking out for developers needs, but instead someone who is looking out for the people living here. Knowing these facts will hopefully be an eye opener and a determining factor come election day on August 26th. We need Truth and we need Leadership and I don't think we will find that in Ms. Stevenson.
 
Roy Miller
July 11th 2008 - 2:30PM
Who's being negative? Commissioner Stevenson's record is on file for everyone to read. Remember, this is an election year, now she's anti sprawl.
 
Cynthia Drach
July 11th 2008 - 3:36PM
I feel Mr. Allbetellio has not lived here in St. Johns County to have a real KNOWLEDGE base to run for office. 30 years ago we were reeling from the effects of the 1970's recession. People had to sell their land for whatever they could get. We had a small boon in the eighties and started to grow a bit. The 90's blessed us with some true opprotunities and it looked like the first decade of the new century was going to do the same. Those who believe we need to stop growing need to understand one thing and only one thing. When an area stops growing and moving forward it is DYING. Growth is not an enemy of Safety, Roads, or the Environment. It actually protects and helps to rebuild this nation's crumbling infrastructure. And that is desperately needed. So Mr. Albitello, if you must run, please at least learn something of the history of the area.
 
Nicoe Alvarez
July 11th 2008 - 5:54PM
Ms. Drach, I truly enjoy this place for many reasons, but the ruthless approval of one subdivision after another without the needed infrastructure in place will not take us forward but so far back that people will start to move elsewhere to find the quality of life they couldn't find here. That would truly be detrimental to this area and not anything we should add to our history, don't you think?
 
cyndi stevenson
July 12th 2008 - 10:29AM
FALSE STATEMENT: Twin Creeks delayed the 210-95 improvements by 2 years. FACT: This Project had all development rights from previous commissions. We approved a funded infrastructure plan-that if they had executed it, would have benefitted our county. In fact, they funded the IMR plans and worked with Federal, State and permitting agencies (SJRWMD and Army Corp) and progressed it-even when their project was going south. I had the county-prepare to take over the project-beginning prior to the new board joining the commission-during the 2005 budget cycle. If we had been so foolish as to simply rely on them to take care of one of the STATE/COUNTY's serious existing problems-that would have been irresponsible. In summary, they did not delay the improvement-but continued to advance it until the county took over the project. BEST OF ALL improvements begin this summer to help keep our community safe. Had we rejected Twin Creeks, people would have cried out that we were fiscally irresponsible-turning away a funded solution for an existing problem. Instead we dealt with an existing infrastructure problem with public money. That deficit is an accumulation of decisions and lack of master planning 210 West. But we should focus on fixing problems and not fixing blame. We are making real progress on this and other issues. It is very simple for Twin
 
cyndi stevenson
July 12th 2008 - 10:35AM
Facts are stubborn things: FALSE STATMENT: Approved 53 feet on Trout Creek. Truth: This redevelopment project was limited to 3 stories and that can only be changed with state zzz county approval. 53 feet would be 4 stories (48 feet ) My opponent has had this explained to him many times. Including in 2 county commission meetings. 53 feet has never been considered by PZA or SJCC on this site-but continues to spread this false information.
 
cyndi stevenson
July 12th 2008 - 10:48AM
charter government: I voted against having the Charter implemented by special act-with no public hearings. It was unnecessary. We had plenty of time to do normal process of Charter Review Commission-or a process defined by the county. Charter by Special act is usually done when there is a crisis in local government The chamber of Commerce had not even seen the Charter-and Hastings only saw it the night before-the commission voted to give it -THE NEXT DAY- to the State Delegation. Yes I opposed it-BAD PROCESS When the act failed-the county began a series of public meetings-some meaningful changes have been made. Two I supported are limiting heights in coastal areas and non partisan local elections. The majority of the board wanted to place this question the August ballot. I supported placing the Charter on the November ballot-to give voters time to learn about it. It does not surprise me to see my opponenet try to use something as important to the future of our county-as changing our form of government for his short term political gain. When you vote against something for lack of process-and you gain the process that is hardly a flip flop on Charter..that is just more political rhetoric.
 
BJ
July 12th 2008 - 12:24PM
WOW! Ms. Stevenson are you starting to get stressed out? I think one of your comments was supposed to be on your blog not Mr. Abbatiello's. You must have been reading them both not knowing where to start, now that's funny...In regards to the charter, BAD PROCESS is right on your part! Are you going to take credit for charter now and try to pretend you are best friends with the people who worked so hard and commited endless hours in getting it to where it is today? What a joke! You know all too well that you were not a driving force in getting charter off the ground, you were more like a roadblock and I am pretty sure non of them will vote for you come August 26th. No matter how much you are trying to explain and justify and flip flop with your political explanations and jargon, your voting history speaks for itself!
 
mary
July 12th 2008 - 2:27PM
Mr Abbatiello has worked hard as a volunteer in his community. He has also contributed to others in the county. These are the kind of people we need in public service.
 
cyndi stevenson
July 13th 2008 - 3:50PM
BJ Your comments on charter are correct. I did not get the charter off the ground. A group of volunteers worked very hard on it. I have praised them often for their work. I believe the choice to go to the legislature by special act was not a wise decision. Since then the county has held public meetings...and fortunately forums are being held by League of Women Voters and the Democrat Club to educate the community on this issue. This is an important decision for our community. I believe for our county-the question isn't IF we have Charter-its when. Up until the last minute the board said they would support placing Charter on the November Ballot. I hope the community has enough time to consider this important issue. Cyndi Stevenson
 
 
Submit a comment:
name:
(15 chars max)
comment:

 
Resources
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT